Search
The Rare & Early Newspapers Hobby
Receive the Newsletter
Buy Historic Newspapers
June 20, 2026 by GuyHeilenman · Leave a Comment
Extra, Extra, Read All About It!
After two decades, we (Timothy Hughes Rare & Early Newspapers), have a brand-new website!
The enhancements are best enjoyed first-hand.
Start your discovery at:
RareNewspapers.com
Juneteenth… The Nuances of Slavery’s End…
June 19, 2026 by Laura Heilenman · Leave a Comment
The saying, “History is a set of lies agreed upon,” often attributed to Napoleon, reminds us how easily we can simplify the past. A few days ago, I read about the story of General Granger’s landmark announcement in Galveston on June 19, 1865. Today, while digging deeper into the same moment, I came across Colonel G.W. Clark’s follow-up order issued in Houston just three days later. Reading both orders side by side offers a fascinating window into how emancipation actually unfolded on the ground in Texas.
General Granger’s General Order No. 3 was the pivotal statewide declaration that brought the Emancipation Proclamation to the last major Confederate holdout. Addressed to “the people of Texas,” it formally informed roughly 250,000 enslaved people that they were free, stressing “absolute equality of personal rights and rights of property” and transforming the old master-slave relationship into one of “employer and hired labor.” Its importance cannot be overstated: this was the public, official moment that ended legal slavery in Texas and gave birth to Juneteenth as a day of celebration and remembrance.
Colonel Clark’s General Orders No. 3, issued on June 22, 1865, for the Post of Houston, played a more localized but equally necessary role. It provided the practical instructions needed to prevent chaos in a major occupied city, directing freedmen to remain temporarily with former owners while reassuring them that doing so would “forfeit none of their rights of freedom.” Clark added details about upcoming labor contracts and consequences for idleness, showing the administrative work required to turn grand declarations into orderly reality.
Though both orders advanced the same goal of peaceful transition, their tones on freedom differed in telling ways. Granger’s language was bold and expansive, celebrating equality and a clean break with the past. Clark’s was more measured and reassuring, carefully balancing direction with the promise that freedom remained intact. Reading them together reveals how emancipation was not a single dramatic event but a layered process—announced with inspiring clarity in one breath and managed with cautious practicality in the next. In that sense, these two orders from 1865 still rhyme with the challenges of turning high ideals into lived experience.
Most Important Election Ever… Washington Takes the Reins…
June 12, 2026 by Laura Heilenman · Leave a Comment
Lead-up to a Nation… as reported in the newspapers of the day (reflecting back on May, 1776)…
June 5, 2026 by GuyHeilenman · Leave a Comment
-
Hope and Defiance – French Sympathy (E39)
-
The New-England Chronicle – A Rare Voice (E40)
-
Powerful Resolves – Battlefield Successes (E41)
-
Addressing Military Overreach – Precedent for Restraint (E42)
- Common Sense – Condemnation of Monarchy (E43)
We hope you are enjoying this year-long trek to the 250th anniversary of The United States through the eyes of those who were fully engaged, first hand. As mentioned previously, all accounts are rooted in what they read in the newspapers of the day.
“History is never more fascinating than when read from the day it was first reported.” (Timothy Hughes, 1975)
May 2026 Newsletter Rare & Early Newspapers…
May 15, 2026 by GuyHeilenman · Leave a Comment
|
Welcome to the latest newsletter from
|
Lead-up to a Nation… as reported in the newspapers of the day (reflecting back on April, 1776)…
May 8, 2026 by GuyHeilenman · Leave a Comment
-
The King’s own Regulars & Their Triumph over the Irregulars – Propaganda (E35)
-
Voices of a Young Nation – Reports: Grim and Grateful (E36)
-
Stirring Reports – Elected Delegates & New Postal System (E37)
-
Independence was Destiny – The Case for Independence (E38)
We hope you are enjoying this year-long trek to the 250th anniversary of The United States through the eyes of those who were fully engaged, first hand. As mentioned previously, all accounts are rooted in what they read in the newspapers of the day.
“History is never more fascinating than when read from the day it was first reported.” (Timothy Hughes, 1975)
This famous Confederate issue, with a contemporary explanation…
May 4, 2026 by TimHughes · Leave a Comment
Over the last 50 years we have sold many genuine issues of the famous “Vicksburg Daily Citizen” issue of July 2 (4), 1863. Its desirability is in the curious background of its creation. If you have received our catalogs through the years, you have likely read of at least one of our offerings, with the details as to how the July 2 issue was left on the press when the Confederates left town when the Yankee forces moved in. As the story goes, Yankee printers found the July 2 issue still on the press, changed the last paragraph to reflect the historic changes that had happened over the previous two days, and printed the paper.
We were not aware until recently that a contemporary issue of the “New York Times” told the story quite well. Page 2 of the August 5, 1863 issue has over a column headed: “The Fall of Vicksburgh” “Last Words of the Vicksburgh Citizen” “A Curious Relic of the Siege”.
The report begins: “When Grant took possession of Vicksburgh, a detachment of the Fifteenth Illinois cavalry visited the office of the ‘Daily Citizen”. They found the number intended for July 2 in type, and the paper all ready for printing, but circumstances had prevented its issue…the paper was very poor wall-paper. The matter was wholly editorial, with the exception of a column and a half of: “Yankee News from all Points” copied from the Memphis Bulletin, a paper which the Citizen says is ‘edited by a pink-nosed, slab-sided, toad-eating Yankee, who is a lineal descendant of Judas Iscariot…” with much more.
Further on, it explains how the last paragraph of the Vicksburg issue came to be: “The Illinois men who visited the office of the ‘Citizen’ thought that this admirable number ought not to be withheld from the subscribers. They set to work at once to print it off, but as it was now the Fourth of July and some changes had taken place since the original editor made up his sheets for the 2d, they brought up the news to date in the following postscript…” , which is the famous paragraph at the bottom of the page that begins: “Two days bring about great changes…”.
The Times article notes in conclusion: “…The copy from which we print the foregoing extracts was furnished to us by Col. Jas. Grant Wilson, of the Fifteenth Illinois cavalry, according to whose request, we have presented to the New York Historical Society.”
Although there are many issues in the realm of rare newspapers that are curious, unusual, or perhaps exceedingly historic in a very unusual way, rarely are collectors treated to a contemporary account of how they came to be. This is one.
One Thing Leads to Another… The Set Up for Patrick Henry’s Give Me Liberty Speech…
April 24, 2026 by Laura Heilenman · Leave a Comment
We usually remember big, dramatic moments however, we rarely pause to reflect on the smaller events that set the table for that seismic shift on the horizon. On March 17, 1775, THE VIRGINIA GAZETTE covered an abundance of Colonial News starting on page one’s article on treason… then moving to a page 2 article covering petitions from the American Congress to the King. Amongst the 8 pages of small print, buried on pg. 3, is a report on a meeting of freeholders from Hanover County stating: “…they proceeded to the choice of delegates to represent them in colony conventions at the town of Richmond…the 20th of next month, when Patrick Henry, jun. and John Syme, Esqrs., were unanimously chosen…”. Just a passing mention really and barely a clue to even the most loyal reader. However, this election laid the groundwork for quickly approaching fireworks that would soon come from electing Patrick Henry. The meeting these newly elected men would attend was the historic Second Virginia Convention where Patrick Henry would give his famous “give me liberty or give me death” speech. One tiny spark in the Spring of 1775 poured gasoline on the lead up to the American Revolution.
Nothing New Under the Sun… Thomas Nast Calls Out Government Fraud…
April 20, 2026 by Laura Heilenman · Leave a Comment
Thomas Nast’s 1875 wood engraving “This Tub Has No Bottom to Stand On,” published in Harper’s Weekly, stands as a searing indictment of Gilded Age graft. In the cartoon, blindfolded Justice hoists a washtub labeled “Public Corruption” by its handles. The metal rings binding it—each stamped with the names of notorious syndicates such as the Tammany Ring, Whiskey Ring, Canal Ring, Indian Ring, and City Ring—snap apart under the strain. The tub’s false bottom, emblazoned “Tammany Hall 1872,” plummets to the floor, spilling a cascade of documented crimes: bribery, internal-revenue frauds, Custom House swindles, Crédit Mobilier scandals, Treasury embezzlement, and Post Office graft. Nast, fresh from dismantling Boss Tweed’s machine, used the image to declare that these interlocking networks of political and corporate plunder possessed no legitimate foundation; once challenged by law or public scrutiny, the entire edifice collapsed, emptying its ill-gotten contents for all to see.
Nearly 150 years later, the United States still contends with systemic corruption that echoes those same structural weaknesses. Transparency International’s 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index gave the country a score of 64 out of 100—its lowest mark on record—ranking it 29th globally and marking a continued slide amid partisan polarization and regulatory capture.
The parallel between Nast’s era and our own is therefore not merely stylistic but substantive. Both periods feature explosive economic growth, technological upheaval, and extreme inequality that lubricate the machinery of graft; historians routinely describe the present as a “second Gilded Age” precisely because corporate-political fusion and fee-based governance have reemerged in updated forms. Yet important differences exist: today’s watchdogs, independent prosecutors, and digital transparency tools act as faster-acting surrogates for Nast’s allegorical Justice, rapidly exposing and clawing back billions that once vanished into obscurity. The enduring lesson of the cartoon therefore persists undiminished: corruption’s tub still has no bottom to stand on. When accountability is applied—whether by cartoonist’s pen or federal indictment—the contents inevitably spill, reminding every generation that vigilance and impartial justice remain the only forces capable of dismantling rings that otherwise appear impregnable.
Who’s Who in Newspapers? Father Thomas edition…
April 13, 2026 by Phineas Q. Wryte · 1 Comment
The 13th installment of Who’s Who in Newspapers
Many visitors to the History’s Newsstand Blog are familiar with the Damascus Affair of 1840 — one of the most consequential antisemitic episodes of the 19th century. Far fewer, however, know the name at the center of the storm: Father Thomas. It is his disappearance that lit the fuse, and it is his name that echoed through the newspapers of the day — including the remarkable report shown below, from our original issue of The Times (London), dated May 8, 1840.
Father Thomas: The Disappearance That Shook the World
Father Thomas of Tuscany (c. 1768–1840) was a Franciscan friar and physician serving in Damascus, Syria, then under the control of Egyptian ruler Mehemet Ali. On February 5, 1840, Father Thomas and his servant Ibrahim Amara vanished without a trace. What followed was not merely a criminal investigation — it was a catastrophe for the Jewish community of Damascus and, ultimately, for Jewish communities across the globe.
French Consul Ulysse de Ratti-Menton seized upon the disappearance to level charges against prominent local Jews, alleging that Father Thomas had been murdered as part of a ritualistic killing — the ancient and thoroughly debunked “Blood Libel” accusation, which falsely claimed that Jews used the blood of Christians in religious rites. Under torture, confessions were extracted. Several Jewish men died in captivity. Others faced execution. The affair sent shockwaves from Damascus to London, Paris, and beyond.
What makes the Damascus Affair historically significant — beyond its immediate horror — is the response it provoked. Jewish leaders in Europe, including Sir Moses Montefiore of England and Adolphe Crémieux of France, organized an international campaign on behalf of the accused, traveling to Egypt to appeal directly to Mehemet Ali. Their efforts represent one of the earliest instances of organized, international Jewish advocacy — a precursor, in many ways, to the modern human rights movement.
The report shown in full below offers a remarkable window into how the affair was unfolding in real time. Sourced from private letters arriving via Malta, the account describes how the Jews of Alexandria petitioned Mehemet Ali on April 9th, asking that those accused of Father Thomas’s murder be judged by the Viceroy himself. Seven leading men were received at the Palace, where Mehemet Ali acknowledged he had never encountered such a charge against the Jewish nation in all his years of rule. Crucially, he forbade the use of torture against the prisoners — a directive sent by dromedary to Commander-General Scheriff Pasha in Damascus. The report concludes with a notable observation: “This spirit of liberality and justice on the part of Mehemet Ali is a striking symptom of the progress of civilization in the East.”
As for Father Thomas himself — his fate was never definitively established. The accusations against the Damascus Jews were never formally dropped, though the imprisoned survivors were eventually released following the international intervention of Montefiore and Crémieux later that summer.
History has long since judged the Damascus Affair as a grotesque miscarriage of justice, fueled by antisemitism and political opportunism. The Blood Libel charge had no basis in fact — then or ever. Yet it is the name of Father Thomas that remains permanently linked to one of the 19th century’s darkest chapters: not because he caused it, but because his disappearance became the pretext for it.
This original Times of London report offers readers of today an unmediated glimpse into the unfolding events of 1840 — and is precisely what makes collecting historic newspapers so endlessly rewarding. The news, as they say, never gets old.